July 30, 2010
Caribana
It's Caribana Parade Weekend in Toronto. Caribana is a festival of Caribbean culture and traditions held here each summer. Annually, Caribana draws hundreds of thousands of tourists from around the globe culminating in over a million revelers on Lakeshore Boulevard, just a few blocks south of my home, for the event's final parade. Caribana is billed as North America's largest street festival.
2010 marks the 43rd Caribana in Toronto. What was once a three-day event has now grown into three weeks of celebration with over a hundred official and unofficial events to see and experience
But the signature event is the parade itself. Over 10,000 masqueraders in elaborate costume will march, strut and dance down the 3.6 km route to the music of steel pan bands, live soca, calypso, reggae and salsa.
Here are some pictures. The fantastic top picture is from Pierre D at the BlogTO Flickr Pool.
Carlos Osorio - Toronto Star.
www.caribanatoronto.com
July 28, 2010
Ticky Tacky - Everything's Relative
Malvina Reynolds might have written her 1962 song "Little Boxes" in response to the Westlake housing developments in Daly City CA, but she would have been really affected by the urban sprawl surrounding most North American cities today.
Westlake - pictures found on Flickr via Telstar Logistics
The Westlake District is one of the first post-war suburbs in the US. I can't appreciate the whole scale of the development but I find the modern and colourful homes quite refreshing compared to the multi-unit suburbs surrounding Toronto. The green and manicured lawns, the Bermuda-like colours and the Jetson-style windows and roof-lines are really pleasant.
Developed by Henry Doelger, Westlake has become an icon for cultural blandness exemplified by endless rows of boxy houses. This obviously inspired the anti-conformist Pete Seger to record Malvina Reynold's song.
Now I'm all for non-conformity too, but I find this song to be narrow-minded and bitchy. Here are the lyrics to the sanctimonious song that I had to sing in Grade 8. I guess my music teacher was a non-conformist too.
Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes made of ticky tacky
Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes all the same,
There's a pink one & a green one
And a blue one & a yellow one
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
And the people in the houses
All went to the university
Where they were put in boxes
And they came out all the same
And theres doctors & lawyers
And business executives
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
And they all play on the golf course
And drink their martinis dry
And they all have pretty children
And the children go to school,
And the children go to summer camp
And then to the university
Where they´re put in boxes
And they come out all the same.
And the boys go into business
And marry & raise a family
In boxes made of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same,
There's a pink one & a green one
And a blue one & a yellow one
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
Urban Sprawl - Greater Toronto Area
Nice, eh? Notice the absence of trees. A friend of ours from Germany, out late one night with the family car, tried to return to the house he'd been staying at in Mississauga but found himself lost on a loopy suburban street that contained houses identical to the address he was trying to find. He had been staying there for a week. That was over 15 years ago. The mind boggles at how bad it is now. Urban planners need to infill. Build up, not out. The two-storey buildings with retail on the main floor and apartments on the second that line most downtown Toronto arteries need to be 3, 4 or 5 storeys. Paris does it, as do most European cities. It works and it provides a vital street scene.
I digress and I seem to be a little off topic. Next, I'll feature some Toronto infill that works.
first image - Tony Bock/Toronto Star File Photo
second image - Antoine Belaieff/ spacing.ca
Westlake - pictures found on Flickr via Telstar Logistics
The Westlake District is one of the first post-war suburbs in the US. I can't appreciate the whole scale of the development but I find the modern and colourful homes quite refreshing compared to the multi-unit suburbs surrounding Toronto. The green and manicured lawns, the Bermuda-like colours and the Jetson-style windows and roof-lines are really pleasant.
Developed by Henry Doelger, Westlake has become an icon for cultural blandness exemplified by endless rows of boxy houses. This obviously inspired the anti-conformist Pete Seger to record Malvina Reynold's song.
Now I'm all for non-conformity too, but I find this song to be narrow-minded and bitchy. Here are the lyrics to the sanctimonious song that I had to sing in Grade 8. I guess my music teacher was a non-conformist too.
Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes made of ticky tacky
Little boxes on the hillside,
Little boxes all the same,
There's a pink one & a green one
And a blue one & a yellow one
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
And the people in the houses
All went to the university
Where they were put in boxes
And they came out all the same
And theres doctors & lawyers
And business executives
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
And they all play on the golf course
And drink their martinis dry
And they all have pretty children
And the children go to school,
And the children go to summer camp
And then to the university
Where they´re put in boxes
And they come out all the same.
And the boys go into business
And marry & raise a family
In boxes made of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same,
There's a pink one & a green one
And a blue one & a yellow one
And they are all made out of ticky tacky
And they all look just the same.
Urban Sprawl - Greater Toronto Area
Nice, eh? Notice the absence of trees. A friend of ours from Germany, out late one night with the family car, tried to return to the house he'd been staying at in Mississauga but found himself lost on a loopy suburban street that contained houses identical to the address he was trying to find. He had been staying there for a week. That was over 15 years ago. The mind boggles at how bad it is now. Urban planners need to infill. Build up, not out. The two-storey buildings with retail on the main floor and apartments on the second that line most downtown Toronto arteries need to be 3, 4 or 5 storeys. Paris does it, as do most European cities. It works and it provides a vital street scene.
I digress and I seem to be a little off topic. Next, I'll feature some Toronto infill that works.
first image - Tony Bock/Toronto Star File Photo
second image - Antoine Belaieff/ spacing.ca
Hells Bells
Why does anyone watch this pugnacious egomaniac anymore? Why do people want to watch others being yelled at? It's beyond me. We all know by now that he's doing it for the camera. He's like the Jerry Springer of TV chefs.
Ramsay's a lot calmer on his other show "The F-Word", but he still named his doomed Christmas turkeys after other famous TV chefs. Nice. I've seen one episode in total and it included a challenge where Hugh Fearnly-Whittingstall made the better dessert. I could almost see steam coming from Ramsay's ears. Tooooot!
Everyone professes to be wound up tighter than a top these days. So why waste our time watching someone so un-Zen. He's no Lorenza De'Medici or Jacques Pepin.
Give this guy the cold shoulder. I'm going to focus more on the Slow Food Movement. That's more my style.
Ramsay's a lot calmer on his other show "The F-Word", but he still named his doomed Christmas turkeys after other famous TV chefs. Nice. I've seen one episode in total and it included a challenge where Hugh Fearnly-Whittingstall made the better dessert. I could almost see steam coming from Ramsay's ears. Tooooot!
Everyone professes to be wound up tighter than a top these days. So why waste our time watching someone so un-Zen. He's no Lorenza De'Medici or Jacques Pepin.
Give this guy the cold shoulder. I'm going to focus more on the Slow Food Movement. That's more my style.
July 27, 2010
Holy Tongue in Cheek - Time to Move On Dr. Laura
I borrowed this excellent piece of satire from Corine at Hidden in France.
In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22.The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan,
James M. Kauffman,
Ed.D. Professor Emeritus,
Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education
University of Virginia
PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)
In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22.The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan,
James M. Kauffman,
Ed.D. Professor Emeritus,
Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education
University of Virginia
PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)
July 9, 2010
New Agatha Christie Mystery
A battered old trunk bought for ₤100 at an auction at Agatha Christie's former home revealed more than what was bargained for. Literally.
Christie enthusiast Jennifer Grant bid on a canvas trunk during a 2006 sale at Greenway House. Auctioneers Bearnes, Hampton and Littlewood presided over the auction in which Grant bid on the trunk. Unbeknownst to them, the trunk, marked with the initials CMM for Clara Margaret Miller who was Agatha Christie's mother, contained a locked stongbox without a key.
The strongbox was a talking point at dinner parties for the intervening years and Grant, obviously not as curious as one might think, finally opened the box in early 2010 and found treasure. In it she found a crocheted bag containing a hoard of gold sovereigns, a diamond ring and a buckle-shaped brooch.
Grant's research revealed that Christie's mother's jewelery did indeed consist of a "diamond buckle, diamond crescent, and diamond engagement ring."
Grant contacted the Antiques Road Show to help her with valuation and authentication John Benjamin from the BBC's Antiques Road Show valued the coins at ₤5,500, the ring between ₤2,500 and ₤3,000 and the brooch at ₤5,500 to ₤7,000. But he said the items could be worth much more if these treasures were proved to be the Christie diamonds. My little grey cells don't have strain too much to come to the conclusion that these are Christie family jewels.
Photos Jeff Gilbert at telegraph.co.uk.
Christie enthusiast Jennifer Grant bid on a canvas trunk during a 2006 sale at Greenway House. Auctioneers Bearnes, Hampton and Littlewood presided over the auction in which Grant bid on the trunk. Unbeknownst to them, the trunk, marked with the initials CMM for Clara Margaret Miller who was Agatha Christie's mother, contained a locked stongbox without a key.
The strongbox was a talking point at dinner parties for the intervening years and Grant, obviously not as curious as one might think, finally opened the box in early 2010 and found treasure. In it she found a crocheted bag containing a hoard of gold sovereigns, a diamond ring and a buckle-shaped brooch.
Grant's research revealed that Christie's mother's jewelery did indeed consist of a "diamond buckle, diamond crescent, and diamond engagement ring."
Grant contacted the Antiques Road Show to help her with valuation and authentication John Benjamin from the BBC's Antiques Road Show valued the coins at ₤5,500, the ring between ₤2,500 and ₤3,000 and the brooch at ₤5,500 to ₤7,000. But he said the items could be worth much more if these treasures were proved to be the Christie diamonds. My little grey cells don't have strain too much to come to the conclusion that these are Christie family jewels.
Photos Jeff Gilbert at telegraph.co.uk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












